Harper Hall
11 Celebrities Who Left Their Kids Out of Their Wills
When most people think about celebrity wealth, they imagine vast fortunes passed down through generations.
However, some famous figures have chosen a different path entirely.
From strained family relationships to strong beliefs about self-sufficiency, these stars decided their children would not inherit their millions.
1. Joan Crawford
Hollywood legend Joan Crawford made headlines long after her death when her will revealed a shocking exclusion.
She specifically wrote out her two older adopted children, Christopher and Christina, from receiving any inheritance.
The relationship between Crawford and these children had deteriorated over the years, marked by allegations of abuse and deep family conflict.
Christina later wrote the controversial memoir “Mommie Dearest,” which painted a disturbing picture of life with the famous actress.
The book became a cultural phenomenon and was adapted into a film.
Crawford’s decision reflected the bitter reality that fame and fortune cannot always repair broken family bonds, leaving a legacy more complicated than any movie role.
2. Tony Curtis
Tony Curtis, the dashing star of classics like “Some Like It Hot,” made a controversial choice near the end of his life.
He left his entire estate to his sixth wife, Jill Vanderberg, completely bypassing his five biological children.
Among those excluded was Jamie Lee Curtis, who had become a successful actress in her own right.
The decision stunned his family and sparked public debate about parental obligations.
Curtis had been married six times throughout his turbulent personal life.
His children were reportedly hurt and confused by the exclusion, though some later spoke about accepting their father’s choice despite the pain it caused their family relationships.
3. Jackie Chan
Action movie superstar Jackie Chan announced plans that surprised fans worldwide: he intends to donate his entire fortune to charity instead of leaving it to his son, Jaycen.
Chan has been vocal about his philosophy that wealthy parents do their children a disservice by simply handing them money.
He believes young people should work hard and create their own success stories.
With an estimated net worth in the hundreds of millions, Chan’s decision represents one of the largest celebrity charitable pledges.
His son has had a complicated relationship with his famous father.
Chan’s stance reflects traditional values about self-reliance mixed with modern philanthropy, creating a legacy based on helping others rather than family wealth.
4. Mickey Rooney
Mickey Rooney’s career spanned an incredible nine decades, making him one of Hollywood’s most enduring performers.
Despite his long life and substantial earnings, Rooney’s final will excluded all of his biological children.
Instead, he left his estate to his stepson, Mark Rooney, who had cared for him during his final years.
The decision came after allegations that some family members had financially exploited the aging actor.
Rooney had been married eight times and fathered nine children throughout his complicated personal life.
His choice highlighted how caregiving and personal relationships in later years can sometimes outweigh biological connections, even for someone who spent nearly a century in the spotlight building a Hollywood legacy.
5. Kirk Douglas
Kirk Douglas, the legendary actor known for “Spartacus” and dozens of other films, made a deliberate choice about his massive fortune.
He directed the majority of his wealth—estimated at over $60 million—to charitable causes rather than his children.
His reasoning was straightforward: his children, including actor Michael Douglas, were already financially secure and successful.
Douglas believed his money could do more good helping others than adding to his family’s existing wealth.
He established foundations supporting education, healthcare, and the arts.
His children publicly supported their father’s decision, understanding his desire to make a broader impact.
This approach showed that wealthy parents can love their children deeply while still choosing philanthropy as their primary legacy.
6. Jerry Lewis
Comedy legend Jerry Lewis made his intentions crystal clear in his final will, explicitly stating that all six children from his first marriage were intentionally excluded.
The document used specific legal language to prevent any challenges, showing this was no accidental oversight.
Lewis had been estranged from these children for many years before his death.
His relationship with his first family had been troubled for decades, with little contact in his later years.
Lewis left his estate to his second wife and their adopted daughter instead.
The comedian never publicly explained his reasons in detail, leaving his excluded children to process the rejection.
His decision became one of Hollywood’s most talked-about inheritance controversies, sparking debates about parental responsibility.
7. Philip Seymour Hoffman
Oscar-winning actor Philip Seymour Hoffman took an unconventional approach to his estate planning before his untimely death.
Rather than setting up trust funds or traditional inheritances for his three children, Hoffman expressed his preference that they build independent lives.
He wanted them to develop their own identities and careers without relying on his wealth.
Hoffman left the bulk of his estate to his longtime partner, trusting she would raise their children with the right values.
He reportedly worried that large inheritances might rob his kids of motivation or create entitled attitudes.
His philosophy reflected concerns many wealthy parents share about balancing financial security with character development, choosing to prioritize life lessons over guaranteed wealth for the next generation.
8. James Brown
The Godfather of Soul, James Brown, left behind more than just incredible music—he left a will that sparked years of legal battles.
Brown directed most of his estate toward creating an education trust to help underprivileged children in South Carolina and Georgia.
His own children were initially excluded from this arrangement, leading to lengthy court disputes.
Brown had experienced poverty during his childhood and valued education as a path to success.
His biological children contested the will, arguing they deserved a portion of their father’s legacy.
The legal fights dragged on for years, with various family members claiming rights to the estate.
Brown’s complicated family situation and multiple relationships made the inheritance issues even more tangled and contentious.
9. Daniel Craig
James Bond actor Daniel Craig made waves when he publicly announced his inheritance plans—or lack thereof.
Craig stated he finds the concept of inherited wealth “distasteful” and does not intend to leave his fortune to his daughters.
Instead, he plans to donate his money to charitable causes, believing this approach creates more meaningful impact.
Craig has earned substantial wealth from his Bond films and other acting roles.
He expressed concern that large inheritances can be damaging rather than helpful to children.
His philosophy aligns with a growing movement among wealthy individuals who prioritize philanthropy.
Craig’s daughters will presumably need to build their own careers and financial security, following their father’s belief in self-made success rather than inherited privilege and comfort.
10. Sting
Rock legend Sting has been remarkably candid about his inheritance plans for his six children.
The former Police frontman has stated there will be little to no inheritance waiting for them when he passes.
Despite accumulating a fortune estimated at over $300 million, Sting believes trust funds would actually harm his children rather than help them.
He has explained that he expects his kids to work and earn their own way in life.
Sting continues to spend his money during his lifetime and plans to donate much of it to charitable causes.
His children have reportedly accepted this approach, understanding their father’s values.
This philosophy reflects his working-class roots and belief that meaningful accomplishment comes from personal effort, not handed-down wealth.
11. Marie Osmond
Entertainment veteran Marie Osmond revealed her surprising inheritance plans during a candid interview.
She intends to leave her children absolutely nothing, choosing instead to spend her money during her lifetime and donate the remainder to charity.
Osmond, who rose to fame as part of the wholesome Osmond family, explained this decision comes from strong personal values.
She believes children should not expect their parents’ money and should instead create their own success.
Osmond has eight children and has been transparent with them about her plans.
She wants to enjoy her wealth while alive and make charitable impacts she can personally witness.
Her approach challenges traditional expectations about family inheritance, prioritizing both present enjoyment and philanthropic goals over leaving a financial legacy.
Comments
Loading…